12 Oct

The religious market does not cease to amaze or shock us these days. Who would have thought that the idea of franchises would come into the religious market operating on a spiritual and financial dimension? Of course Church history has it that prior to the Reformation one of the corrupt practices of Bishops was the sale or auctioning of lucrative congregations to Priests. This practice became well-known as Simony. A franchise is an authorisation granted by a government or company to an individual or group enabling them to carry out specified commercial activities. For example one may get a franchise to run a McDonald’s Restaurant. This involves a financial investment and training to meet the required standards to run such a franchise. In return the owners of McDonald’s Chain of Restaurants will also get some financial benefit on such a deal. In the religious arena, a new emphasis or a distortion rather, has arisen of having a Spiritual Father well-known as Papa. The Father/Son relationship as depicted in Paul and Timothy is a genuine biblical practice. But what exists in some religious circles is a distortion of biblical values which are supposed to be there for the common good of God’s work. This is not just a father/son relationship but rather a Religious Franchise or modern re-incarnation of Simony (A term derived from Simon the Sorcerer) whereby the son is endowed with spiritual anointing from the Papa and in return the Papa is given a financial benefit which goes beyond an ordinary honorarium. The son will continually tap into the Papa’s anointing whilst the Papa enjoys financial proceeds from the son. Even where the Papa lives in a foreign country, it is the duty of the son to make several pilgrimages to see the Papa. In some cases the Papa may visit the son so as to ascertain the success of the franchise. Such a relationship of mutual benefit can easily turn into a fiasco if the son forgets to regularly and appropriately remember to bless the Papa generously. Could it be that if Simon the Sorcerer lived in our times, he would not have got a public rebuke as the Apostle Peter did to him? Simon was a new convert, who when he saw other converts receiving the Holy Spirit by the laying of hands by Peter and John, he offered them money in exchange of the ability to dispense the Holy Spirit. My opinion is that Simon would have easily got such a franchise from some of our modern day Preachers. But Peter refused to put the gifts of God for sale. He had the courage to rebuke Simon and tell him off that his heart was not right before God. I have no problem with a genuine Father/Son relationship in ministry. I also have a father in the Faith and I have many sons in the Faith. I have no problem with a son willingly blessing his Spiritual Father financially. I am seriously concerned when such a spiritual relationship is commercialised into a Religious Franchise i.e. Simony of a higher order. In the spirit of Apostle Peter May I hasten to say that whosoever is doing this, their heart is not right with God. I rest my case.


Posted by on October 12, 2016 in Uncategorized


Tags: , , , , , , , ,

2 responses to “THE PAPA/SON RELIGIOUS FRANCHISE (Acts 8:9-23)

  1. Wellington Mahati

    August 13, 2015 at 07:18

    Franchise. I have learnt yet another word today,”simony”, thank you Reverend.This is true,and it is happening today in the body of Christ. The gifts and blessings of God put on sale Via this papa&son circus. This is been done in a very clever and subtle manner. As long as the spiritual son can afford to flash out cash and gifts to the papa whenever he(the papa) coughs or sneezes all is well. The son receives VIP treatment,prophecies and more anointing without even prayer/fasting, but through cash(there is now nothing like paying the price through prayer and fasting,everything is for sale in this arrangement).

    Another interesting thing emerges as their fiasco escalates to another level Reverend: When the son gets enlightened/feels that he has contributed enough cash and material gifts to the papa. The Papa now will be saying”If ever you leave me/think of it,my anointing I gave to you will return to me and you will return the way you came to me in the first place”. On the other hand the son will be saying “I paid you enough whatever you gave to me I bought it from you. Give me back my money”. truly they will be a fiasco Reverend, between these two traders. I will leave it here.

  2. pkapisa

    August 28, 2015 at 22:11

    spot on man of God. there is exaggeration of the papa/son relationship so much that the sons use the name of papa to exorcise shld I say. we only got one name.. Jesus by which all things are done..


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: